← Evals & Launch Decisions / 24
hardNewGoogleMicrosoftAmazon

Our fraud model has a 0.96 ROC-AUC, but reviewers cannot handle its alerts. Would you launch it?

Try it in the practice workspaceDraft your answer before comparing it with the rubric.

Choose an operating threshold using prevalence, error costs and review capacity. A good ranking score can still produce an unusable queue.

Updated Oct 2026 · Original practice questions with worked answers and teaching rubrics. Our editorial policy explains the sources, review process and limits.

Case briefRead the inputs, then make your call

All figures are fictional. You own a fraud alert system that sends transactions to trained reviewers; full automatic blocking is also being proposed.

Scenario inputs
Daily population10,000 transactions: 100 confirmed frauds and 9,900 legitimate transactions.
Candidate AROC-AUC 0.96; selected threshold detects 80% of frauds and flags 2% of legitimate transactions.
Candidate B threshold60 true positives and 40 false positives on the same population.
Review capacity200 cases per day.
Illustrative error costs$100 per missed fraud; $5 per unnecessary review. Other operational and customer costs need investigation.
Calibration sampleAmong 200 representative cases scored at about 80% fraud probability, 100 were fraud.

Your task. Choose an operating policy and rollout scope. Calculate the confusion matrix, precision and workload; explain which evidence would change your decision.

Choose an operating threshold using prevalence, error costs and review capacity. A good ranking score can still produce an unusable queue.

This reference answer is in Premium. Free signup opens other answers.

9 answers per topic instead of 5, and your progress kept · no cardor unlock all 420 remaining answers
UP NEXT ON YOUR JOURNEY
NOTES & DISCUSSION · 0

No comments yet. How would you have answered?