launch decisions

The model stayed the same, some runs disappeared and the grader changed. Reconcile the report before deciding what the result supports.

Account for errors that survive clinician review, the full sensitive-data path and the time spent correcting notes.

A behavioural question with a technical core: how you turned a readiness argument into agreed criteria and shared evidence, what you were wrong about, and whether the relationship survived.

A values question at AI labs and regulated companies. Panels want judgment about real risk, a constructive path forward, and courage without self-righteousness.

Panels want to hear that you did not average two signals. Show how you found out which one was measuring the wrong thing, and what you added to the launch gate afterwards.