Applicants use AI to optimize CVs while employers automate screening. How would you improve this hiring marketplace?
Make your call first. Use the published answer and rubric to examine your reasoning when you are ready.
Case briefRead the inputs, then make your call
A hiring marketplace sees applicants optimizing CVs with AI while employers automate screening. These pilot figures are fictional and use an agreed job-relevance rubric.
| Application pool | 1,000 applications for a comparable role family. |
|---|---|
| Current screen | 100 advanced; independent reviewers judge 60 qualified. |
| Proposed screen | 150 advanced; independent reviewers judge 75 qualified. |
| Review capacity | Recruiters can assess 120 candidates. |
| Missing labels | Rejected applications have not been independently reviewed. Candidate burden and later job outcomes are not yet measured. |
Your task. Choose the product change and evaluation design. Explain the precision, capacity and missing-label problems, and how candidates can correct screening mistakes.
0 words