human review

A convincing field score can conceal a wrong purchase order. Define the complete unit of work, preserve page and row evidence, and calculate the review queue before choosing autonomy.

At a low base rate even a good classifier mostly flags teens who are fine. Decide what triggers an alert, who reviews it, what the parent sees and what the teen is told.

Turn confidence scores into a defensible approval policy. Work through selective accuracy, uncertainty, correlated errors and review capacity before deciding which invoice fields can bypass a human.

A large-scale design question where every error is someone's real harm: harmful content left up, or legitimate speech taken down. Strong answers tier by severity and confidence, keep humans in the hard cases, and measure both kinds of error per language.

Self-reported minutes saved, a randomised trial and one deployer's own records disagree by an order of magnitude. Decide what the scribe may do, how patients are told and what you will measure.

Translate a research result into a product-specific threat, a testable control and an operating plan with enough capacity to work.